Standard Deviation

Dispersion of Values

Archive for the ‘Relationships (Good)’ Category

Give and take relationships are out

Posted by controversial1 on December 4, 2008

I remember my father talking to me one day about relationships.  He explained to me that a relationship was a series of concessions between two people.  A give & take scenario.  That ideal worked for my parents and they have been married for just shy of 50 years.  In my case, it did not work.  I have been involved in a couple of “bad” relationships that ultimately failed because they became “take and no give”.  I told my son in a recent conversation about relationships that I felt a good relationship requires tolerance and acceptance of differences but the push-pull mecahnics of my dad’s “give and take” should be “give & give”.  I have always felt that this would help to ensure a stronger, more satisfying relationship for both persons.

Truly loving our spouse is giving them the freedom to be who it is they are. When we love without WANTING anything in return, that is when we have accepted our spouse for being who they are, faults and all.
This of course, doesn’t include iniquitous behaviour because if anyone is carrying on and regularly doing things in err against, they certainly are not being the person they were meant to be. Therefore, this article does not apply to them.

Love is an option; we select the degree of love and what kind of love we will give to our spouse through our actions. Love can sometimes be confusing and misleading, especially if couples are going through trials and tribulations in their marriage and are demanding of one another.
We think that if we could change our spouse, we’ll suddenly be happy and contented with our self. We try and change our spouse because we have stopped accepting them for who they are. Therefore, we cannot seem to love them either.

Pretty soon, we begin to place nasty conditions on the love we give to our spouse. If their faults irritate us bad enough we might not give ANY love at all. Sound familiar?
With no love left to give to our spouse, we might think we have nothing in common anymore? Who knows, maybe we begin to think we married the wrong person? Suppose the person we met last week at work is better than our spouse? Pretty soon we have brainwashed our self into believing our feelings.

Really, we just need to try and not let those little things bother us. Even some of the bigger things we can detach from. Forgive. Turn the other cheek. Do these things even when you don’t want to! Communicate the issue. Let your spouse know what bothers you, but don’t make it into a tirade.

Don’t scream and yell at them about how bad they are, instead find something positive to say about them. Make them feel good about them self. That’s what works!!
What about, “I’ll scratch your back, if you scratch mine”. This is good in marriage. There is nothing wrong with the “give and take” type rapport with each other. In fact, this is essentially how couples love each other.
No one can ever love unconditionally, without demands, bargains or expectations, never. You know why? Because we’re just human, we err, and we have faults.
We need to accept that and move on with our life; hopefully that moving on includes our spouse.

The “give and take” process is a natural occurrence; it is instinctive to do something nice for our spouse because they have done something nice for us. We give and take all day long with most of our interaction in our daily lives; it’s part of life.

Most marriages work in this fashion; it is a good way for marriage to flourish and grow. It keeps couples on their toes as far as remembering to “give” of themselves periodically to their spouse EVEN when they don’t want to. That is love.

Now, there is a big difference when we put ultimatums on the table. Dishing out ultimatums is more of a “nasty conditional love” and is based on selfish thinking and usually stems from one or both spouses harbouring resentment. “I’ll love you, only if you will stop going out with your friends”, etc.
This is not love, but a selfish person trying to get their way through manipulation and ultimatums!

Love is created by a person and not just is. Love takes action to accomplish. The value of the love we give to our spouse is based on how we are feeling at any given moment and time.
If we feel resentment or bitterness towards those we love, we’ll inevitably love with resentment and bitterness, which is one way we place nasty conditions on our love.

Loving someone in the real sense of the word is allowing him or her to be who it is they are. When we learn to play the “give and take” game fairly is when can accept the person we are married to.
Bottom line, accept your spouse for who they are, give to your spouse without wanting anything in return, and it will eventually be given back to you.

Acceptance Is LOVE.

Posted in Relationships (Good) | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Nostalgic Interlude

Posted by controversial1 on February 12, 2008

I have seen your picture. An image of the outer shell…the cover of the book. I am intrigued by the cover. The cover is attractive and has the qualities I am attracted to.

As I begin to read the book, I am intrigued and yet something in the first chapter causes me to put it down. A tragedy. The two main characters have a falling out, their first fight. Conflict does not intrigue me.
I pick up the book again and find myself not only intrigued but entranced.
I am very hard to intrigue on a mental level. I have seen and heard a lot of things over the years.
I have never met you but I can see you; more importantly “feel” you.

I feel that we have to shed our outer selves and all that we connect with and form a bond that exists “outside the box.”

Embracing the moments of love and friendship.

It is through various acts of doing nothing that they create and appreciate meaningful and touching relationships. Romantic relationships tend to be remembered through the significant events that punctuate them rather than the daily experience of living them. So often the conclusions we reach about relationships happen after the fact. It is a great challenge to define or understand what it means to experience relationships more and talk about them less.

Relationships are part of the flow of ordinary life, punctuated by moments of reflection, which in turn are heightened by significant events.

Or from an existentialist perspective:
Relationships are in fact created by our reflections on the experiences of which they are a part.

Posted in Relationships (Good) | Leave a Comment »